← Search

Connie Elim

Bothell, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
122 matches · 82W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 9% stay · 91% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Lower than today’s 3.25 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.0
1 of 12
WA · 3.0
9 of 755

Connie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Connie has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Connie has gone from the 56th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 64.8% of games
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 58.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 37.2% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.4% of games
6.0mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
W
Christina Snyder / Yong Bakoschamps
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Bofan Hsu
+0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Bofan Hsu
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Bofan Hsu
−0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nickolay Tchervenski
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Lisa Brouelette / Ryan Allenmixed
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nickolay Tchervenski
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Yang
−0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joyce Fang
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wen Cui
−0.011about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · with Christina Vanburen
−0.016about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Lindsay Jackson / Sara Millerchamps
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · with Christina Vanburen
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Christina Vanburen
−0.044below expectation — took 47% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Karen Dalton / Laura Karassik
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
−0.026below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 5-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.