Search

Lindsay Jackson

SNOQUALMIE, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 40W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
11%
stay 3.0
89%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 54% stay · 46% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.99. Lower than today’s 3.10 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
111 of 960

Lindsay is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lindsay has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lindsay has gone from the 97th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 63.7% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
Gegi Wardchamps
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles
+0.012better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Skylar Sherwood / Nita Khandelwalchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Wate
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Tish Brown
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.018about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 2-0
W
Jodi Freudenberger / Lan Lancia Guo
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Wate
+0.021better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.052better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Kathy Brindle / Susan Lusty
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Miller
0.030below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Wendy Laird
2026-04-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Ashley Dierickx
2026-04-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 52% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Connie Elim / Christina Vanburenchamps
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · with Sara Miller
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Wate
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Christine Alley Krabak / Lisa Haganchamps
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · with Cheryl Wate
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Kathy Juhn / Ann Rae Smith
2026-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Buck
+0.007better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.