← Search

Susan Lusty

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 61W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Lusty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Pratley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Jerome mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Aalfs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Personality Hires · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Personality Hires · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Vincent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Lewin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Suzuki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · NWW-TCSP-Willgerodt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-5
L
2026-06-04 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Flock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
48%
12W–13L · 49% of games
3.0
37.8%
28W–46L · 44.6% of games
6.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.6% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
26.7%
8W–22L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams