Search

Keith Jerome

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 35W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
106 of 144
WA · 3.0
493 of 755

Keith is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Keith has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Keith has gone from the 20th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 46.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
Mary Dwyer / Mark Eshommixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mayumi Willgerodt
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Scott Shapiro / Letitia Selkmixed
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Jones
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Davis Feng / Zhihang Liu
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.021better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-5
W
Michael Cotta / Travis Vail
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jiafang Liu / Leo Liu
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.014better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Mike Anderson / Dan Swanson
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.028better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Ron Benson / Ravdeep Pasricha
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Stephen Daniel / Ivan Hernandez Serrano
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
+0.030better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Tee Yokobe / Mark West
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Jones
+0.022better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Ramon Calpe / Randy Barber
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Jones
+0.077better than expected — took 68% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Matt Dunbar / Alex Biller
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ross Bunker
0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
James Barber / Richard Aylen
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ross Bunker
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.