Search

Natalie Matthews

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 12W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
227 of 252
WA · 3.0
986 of 1107

Natalie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Natalie has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Natalie has gone from the 4th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
20.9%
9W–34L · 35.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 17.2% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
Nina Moorad / Daniel Ivanismixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colin Williams
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Barks
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Brittany Caldwell / Alana Holmquist
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Davis
0.036below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Rama Karve / Li Wang
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Roitman
+0.102better than expected — took 80% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Roitman
+0.015about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Berit Bergquist / Jennifer Carrillo
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Davis
+0.023better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Shanta Freeman / Lee Darrow
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Whissell
+0.052better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Tatyana Gordon / Teresa Martinez
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne Crabs
+0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Sycamore
0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Sharon Drake
2026-01-10 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Alice Bankson / Janice Walters
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Sycamore
0.015below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Geeta McCormack
0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.