Search

Alice Bankson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
94 matches · 31W–63L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
63%
stay 3.0
37%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
65 of 144
WA · 3.0
295 of 755

Alice is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alice has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Alice has gone from the 27th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
49.1%
27W–28L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
11.5%
3W–23L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Fraker
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
arvind Mallikarjunan / Teresa Kingmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Barbano
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Catherine Sampson Brooks / Amy Trang
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Gupta
0.002about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Minori Yoshioka / Michiel Versteegmixed
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Kelley
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Green
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Green
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Nancy Rodriguez / Utsav Prabhumixed
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chester Weir
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Reese Cowan Stewart / Elizabeth Peijnenburg
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Muchongwe
+0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Caiping Zang / Christina Ntouniaoglou
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Champagne
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Elizabeth Bergan / Brandie Still
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Gupta
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Walters
0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Xiaozhen Liu / Jiayao Wang
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.