Search

Suzanne Monson

Lake Forest Park, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
77 matches · 36W–41L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 46% stay · 54% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
81 of 755

Suzanne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Suzanne has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Suzanne has gone from the 3rd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 53% of games
3.5
35%
14W–26L · 43.7% of games
7.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Combs
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Combs
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Terry Lundeen / Dorothy Lowesmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Nguyen
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Julia Pollock / Mary Baileychamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Evelyn Yu
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jane Eidsaune / Ann Goodenberger
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evelyn Yu
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Mary Dwyer / Sarah Wilke
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marla Vasilatos
+0.008better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Mary Turino / Liza Minasyan
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammi Tompkins
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Erin Corson / Tove Martin
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammi Tompkins
0.018about as expected — took 61% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Karen Dunlop / Michelle Jordan
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evelyn Yu
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Janice Walters / Alice Bankson
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Landry-Navarro
+0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evelyn Yu
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Lakshmi Rajesh / Swetha Sridharan
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammi Tompkins
0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.