Search

Erin Corson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 31W–29L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
134 of 213
WA · 3.0
573 of 960

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 4th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.6% of games
3.0
48.7%
19W–20L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Bouma
+0.027better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Kelly Ambrose / Rainie McLaughlin
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reese Cowan Stewart
0.038below expectation — took 54% of games against 67% expected
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Lakshmi Rajesh / Sneha Shivakumar
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Caldwell
+0.057better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tove Martin
+0.017about as expected — took 39% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Alaniz / Jennifer Carrillo
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reese Cowan Stewart
+0.028better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jennifer Longtin / Liv Olson
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tove Martin
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Suanty Kaghan / Mary Dwyer
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reese Cowan Stewart
0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jiandan Zheng / Xiaobei Li
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reese Cowan Stewart
+0.028better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Xiaozhen Liu / Jiayi Lin
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tove Martin
+0.039better than expected — took 68% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Teresa Martinez / Mary Turino
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Peijnenburg
0.036below expectation — took 35% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lisa Hagan / Christine Alley Krabak
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Burgess
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reese Cowan Stewart
0.022below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 4-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.