← Search

Sarah Wilke

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 92W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Wilke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
W
2026-06-28 · Sarah Wilke's Team · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-0
L
2026-06-07 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · NTC-Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-29 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · NTC-Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Junghee Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Khue Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-10 · Sarah Wilke's Team · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Sarah Wilke's Team · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · NTC-Kennedy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · NTC-Kennedy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
59.8%
58W–39L · 53.9% of games
3.5
40%
14W–21L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#1 Singles
12%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer