← Search

Sarah Wilke

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
162 matches · 88W–74L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
70%
stay 3.0
30%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
72 of 144
WA · 3.0
320 of 755

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sarah has gone from the 21st to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
62.8%
54W–32L · 54.8% of games
3.5
40%
14W–21L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history162 matches
W
Jingci Wang
2026-06-28 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 3-0
L
Ella Odland / Elisabeth Odland
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
−0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Dwyer
−0.008below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Anahit Sukhudyan
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.020about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Elizabeth Graves / Helen Wang
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blum
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tereza Birch / Sasha Moinzadeh
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
−0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Porsha Kahlon / Super Sandy
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Junghee Kim
−0.058below expectation — took 33% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Khue Tran
+0.089better than expected — took 100% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Allison del Giorno
2026-05-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Lindsey Nelson
2026-05-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.025better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Sara Burgess
2026-04-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jing Peng
2026-04-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.