← Search

Elizabeth Graves

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Graves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-19 · CP-40 Mixed-Grobstok · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · CP-40 Mixed-Grobstok · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-29 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarika Calla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Grobstok championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · CP-Victorious-Becker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.9%
17W–20L · 50% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Singles
20%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer