← Search

Elizabeth Graves

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2023
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
13 of 17
WA · 3.0
482 of 755

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elizabeth has gone from the 23rd to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
45.9%
17W–20L · 50% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Graves
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Daisy Cullop / Steve Hinshawmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Graves
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
−0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
+0.033better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Bridget Haba / Erin Park
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wang
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Katrina Miller / Toby Miller
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarika Calla
−0.020below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Eve Le / Hyemin Jeon
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
+0.011about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Andrea Ng / Jessie Drakulich
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
+0.040better than expected — took 37% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Lisa Small / Emiko Hobbschamps
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Grobstok
−0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
−0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Huyen Hoang / Kelly Kuhn
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.037better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.