Search

Linda Greenlaw

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
121 matches · 42W–79L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
47 of 63
WA · 3.0
530 of 755

Linda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Linda has gone from the 13th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 52.2% of games
3.5
15%
6W–34L · 40.2% of games
6.0
25%
5W–15L · 43.3% of games
7.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Farrell
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Tracy Green / Eric Fredricksenmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Baird
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Nona Allison / Robert Fishmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Lu
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Goldberg
0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Bekah Burdick / Anne Roddy
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Pandey
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Goldberg
+0.040better than expected — took 52% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Cigdem Mayhew / Shannon Garbaccio
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Pandey
+0.003about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Salma Gharib / Tien Cheng
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Enstrom
0.038below expectation — took 35% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Vona
+0.004about as expected — took 39% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Lacey Tacher / Lindsay Goode
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Pandey
0.020below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
2-2
W
Jenny Wyatt / Darbie Kirk
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Wong
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Carlson
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.