← Search

Linda Blegen

Auburn, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Blegen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-22 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Cotton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-04 · BETC-Boomer Rangs-Blegen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aiko Tamiya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Cotton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · BETC-Boomer Rangs-Blegen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shauna Eggen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · BETC-True Grit-Almer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-21 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
6.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.1% of games
7.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert