← Search

Linda Blegen

Auburn, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
54%
stay 3.0
46%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Auburn · 3.0
4 of 9
WA · 3.0
265 of 755

Linda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 2 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Linda has gone from the 28th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
6.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.1% of games
7.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
Larissa Kazantsev / Delena Palenachamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann
−0.020below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann
+0.003about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Ann Lampman / Betsy Chamberlin
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Cotton
−0.040below expectation — took 48% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Lori Nelson / Ann Rae Smith
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
−0.029below expectation — took 32% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aiko Tamiya
−0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Cotton
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Lee Darrow / Jane O'Brien
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
−0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Kimberly Demuth / Julie Sedlacek
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shauna Eggen
−0.004about as expected — took 68% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann
+0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
+0.049better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
DeeDee Heathman / Carolyn McKernan
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Mann
−0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.