← Search

Nadine Johnson Rice

Federal Way, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 87W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nadine Johnson Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-07-12 · BETC-Schiller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Fan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Debbie Dymarkowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Debbie Dymarkowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · BETC-Schiller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aris Rosario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne Mikkelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Escame-Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Escame-Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thara Veeramachaneni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sievkheng Ly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
L
2026-05-16 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Dymarkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Dymarkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.2% of games
3.0
61.4%
27W–17L · 59.7% of games
3.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.9% of games
6.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 57.4% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams