← Search

Sievkheng Ly

Edgewood, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 28W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
9%
stay 3.0
91%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 51% stay · 49% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.11 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
95 of 755

Sievkheng is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sievkheng has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sievkheng has gone from the 8th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.3% of games
3.5
36.5%
19W–33L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwayoung Srein
+0.012better than expected — took 61% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sachiko Urano
+0.014about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sachiko Urano
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwayoung Srein
−0.008below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Neeley
+0.025better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Johnson Rice
+0.056better than expected — took 55% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 5-5
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Neeley
+0.022better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Claflin
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Corinne Smith / Kathy Loken
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kwok
+0.030better than expected — took 38% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cook
−0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Amanda Wilkerson / Melinda Rowan
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Hebert
−0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Monica Ghambari / Jeanne Cubanski
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Neeley
+0.037better than expected — took 41% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.