← Search

Shelly Hebert

Lake Tapps, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
201 matches · 108W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 42 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Tapps · 3.0
7 of 8
WA · 3.0
563 of 755

Shelly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shelly has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shelly has gone from the 94th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
55.9%
33W–26L · 55.6% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.1% of games
6.0
72.5%
37W–14L · 57.7% of games
7.0
20%
4W–16L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
61.8%
21W–13L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history201 matches
W
Michelle Burgess / Susan Buschchamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Loreal ARGYLE
−0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Loreal ARGYLE
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Ann Strueby
−0.060below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kristen Case / Cheryl Selby
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Rasanen
−0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loreal ARGYLE
+0.025better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Ann Strueby
+0.014about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Janie Daray / Larry Power
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Stewart
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Vance Safley / Vera Jeanmixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryson Huie
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Adams
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Mona Forster / Evelyn Savarin
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz VanDerschelden
+0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Dan Crowell / Lorie Crowellmixed
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz VanDerschelden
−0.080below expectation — took 33% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.