Search

Kristen Case

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 25W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
79%
stay 3.0
21%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
22 of 41
WA · 3.0
367 of 755

Kristen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kristen has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Kristen has gone from the 42nd to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.4% of games
6.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.4% of games
7.0
30%
9W–21L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
W
Mona Forster / Connie Ray
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Selby
+0.060better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Finn
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Selby
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Wendy Platzer / Patti Hutchison
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Finn
+0.059better than expected — took 52% of games against 30% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Kris Adams / Liz VanDerschelden
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Stern
0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Selby
+0.015better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Loretta Conway / Katie Baird
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Leanne Hill / Barbara Johnson
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Stern
0.029below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Selby
0.001about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Stern
+0.089better than expected — took 100% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Sue Chelikas / Janet Hoganchamps
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cindy Stoneback
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Niena Jerdee / Martha Morleychamps
2025-11-07 · #2 Doubles · with Shelley Stern
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.