← Search

Sue Chelikas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Morton, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 68W–142L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Bullock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Bullock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Davis/Wombacher-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Julien
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-14 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Davis/Wombacher-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lois Yoches
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-28 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shari Windsor
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Davis/Wombacher-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Ellis
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Knepp championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Schnepf championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-23 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Burkard-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Pulce-Flynn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Kendzierski
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Schnepf
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Burkard-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Amulraj
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.4% of games
3.5
37.3%
22W–37L · 45.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 49.4% of games
6.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.4% of games
6.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.2% of games
7.0
35.4%
23W–42L · 45.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.6% of games
8.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 35.2% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.4% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
61 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer