← Search

Jan Dickerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lincoln, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 109W–106L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history215 matches
W
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Morgan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Morgan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Morgan championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Reckard-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Morgan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Reckard-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Reckard
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-18 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Reckard-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Morgan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Reckard-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Reckard
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Reckard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Conni Tipsord
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Rebholz
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-13 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Reckard-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Reckard
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Rebholz
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
63.8%
37W–21L · 53.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–8L · 27.3% of games
7.0
65.6%
42W–22L · 58.8% of games
7.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–10L · 32.5% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 49.1% of games
7.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 28.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
134 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova