← Search

Pamela Finn

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
95 matches · 34W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
57%
stay 3.0
43%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
13 of 41
WA · 3.0
277 of 755

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Pamela has gone from the 61st to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 41.2% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
7.0
41.3%
26W–37L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Droll
−0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Case
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Wendy Platzer / Patti Hutchison
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Case
+0.059better than expected — took 52% of games against 30% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Karen Little / Pam Rasanen
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Maggi
−0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Howard
−0.050below expectation — took 35% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Howard
−0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kathy Shouse / Barbara Johnson
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Howard
−0.017about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Howard
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlet Herrick
+0.018about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlet Herrick
−0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretchen Gacetta
+0.012about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlet Herrick
−0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.