Search

Rochelle Fransen

Olympia, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
42%
stay 2.5
58%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 81% stay · 19% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.43. Lower than today’s 2.52 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
20 of 35

Rochelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rochelle has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Rochelle has gone from the 6th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
3.0
37.8%
14W–23L · 44.1% of games
6.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
W
Janie Daray / Sandy Howard
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abby Grant
+0.023better than expected — took 54% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Stoneback
+0.026better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Abegg
+0.050better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Janie Daray / Karen Tracy
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Ray
+0.032better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Shelly Hebert / Kris Adams
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Tokarczyk
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Chris Stewart / Karen Little
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.019better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.080better than expected — took 67% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Leanne Hill / Deanna Huie
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dawn Weigand
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Dawn Umstot / Gina Lake
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristine Cramer
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Karen Oie / Brenda Sanders
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Martha Brenna
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Shannon Suchland / Liz Imholt
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kendra Brandenburg
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jacqueline Passios / Hiam Asmarchamps
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · with Deborah Sargeant
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.