Search

Teresa Conover

Puyallup, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
45 matches · 12W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Puyallup · 3.0
5 of 5
WA · 3.0
608 of 755

Teresa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Teresa has gone from the 47th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 47.8% of games
7.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara van Sickle
+0.027better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Souza
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Johnson
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loretta Conway
0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Mona Forster / Connie Ray
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Souza
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Baird
+0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Karen Little / Pam Rasanen
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Souza
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Souza
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loretta Conway
0.014below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 5-1
L
Marybeth Matlock / Martha Maggi
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marsha White
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Casey Hunter
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loretta Gohd
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.