Search

Loretta Gohd

Port Orchard, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
116 matches · 70W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Port Orchard · 3.5
4 of 6
WA · 3.5
823 of 1209

Loretta is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Loretta has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Loretta has gone from the 76th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 47.2% of games
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.9% of games
7.0
60.3%
41W–27L · 54.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan
0.021below expectation — took 46% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan
0.018below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Mollie Gosselin / CHERI TURNER
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Ann Strueby
+0.016about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Vicki Moll / Patti Hutchison
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kendra Niesz
0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan
0.024about as expected — took 65% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Baird
0.027below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Conover
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Suzette Willetts / Mary Fox
2026-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darlene Dagan
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Debi Vodvarka / Lucy Denham
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Gugliotto
+0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Karen Cunningham / Lisa Derheim
2026-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lea Poirier
0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Roberta Dierks / Anita Chatigny
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Gugliotto
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Michele Mcgee / Susan Whitby
2026-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darlene Dagan
+0.037better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.