← Search

Deborah Sargeant

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
132 matches · 67W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
68%
stay 3.0
32%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
16 of 41
WA · 3.0
316 of 755

Deborah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Deborah has gone from the 71st to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 54.1% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 37.3% of games
6.0
67.4%
31W–15L · 56.4% of games
7.0
35.6%
16W–29L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Anne Bennett / Lisa Smith
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
−0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Marybeth Matlock / Violet Clerget
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Tokarczyk
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Abegg
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Eileen Pilcher / Barbara Wyatt
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Abbott
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mona Forster
−0.013about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.045better than expected — took 47% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.015better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Doreen Gavin / Patti Hutchison
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Maggi
+0.013about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Maggi
+0.015about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Abbott
+0.024about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nachiko Yamamoto
+0.071better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.