← Search

Sharon Abegg

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
186 matches · 77W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
77%
down to 3.0
23%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 51% down · 49% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Higher than today’s 2.94 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.5
47 of 47
WA · 3.5
1208 of 1209

Sharon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sharon has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sharon has gone from the 6th to the 4th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
59.5%
22W–15L · 56.3% of games
3.5
18.2%
10W–45L · 37.2% of games
6.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.9% of games
7.0
32.6%
15W–31L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Sargeant
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.007about as expected — took 46% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Goerig
+0.042better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.083below expectation — took 8% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Droll
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.013about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Waters
−0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Fransen
+0.050better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
−0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Katie Pusztai / Jennifer Butler
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Waters
−0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Tracy
+0.014about as expected — took 32% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Teresa Conover / Loretta Conway
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.014better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 5-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.