← Search

Katie Pusztai

Gig Harbor, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 35W–14L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 42 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 11% stay · 89% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Lower than today’s 3.24 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.0
2 of 12
WA · 3.0
16 of 960

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Katie has gone from the 89th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 67.4% of games
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 62.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindy Mense
−0.033about as expected — took 100% of games against 95% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 73% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
MaryEllen Atkinson / Courtney Stepp
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.027better than expected — took 100% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Morgan Steele / Whitney Eng
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Snyder
−0.003better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Maria Kelly / Steve Racinemixed
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Lisa Smith / Anne Bennett
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindy Mense
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.039better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony McLean
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony McLean
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Susan Boczar / David Earlmixed
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 67% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ivester
−0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Butler
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.