Search

Eileen Pilcher

TACOMA, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
113 matches · 42W–71L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
940 of 1209

Eileen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eileen has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0202120252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Eileen has gone from the 24th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 37.1% of games
7.0
59%
23W–16L · 52.2% of games
8.0
26.1%
12W–34L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Fletcher
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Wyatt
0.010about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Toni Loomis / Vicki Seaman
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristan Nichols
+0.032better than expected — took 61% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Wyatt
0.013below expectation — took 54% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Mollie Gosselin / Toni Loomis
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Fletcher
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Wyatt
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mollie Gosselin
0.043below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Denise A Cahalan / Dawn Greene
2026-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hedy Kurland
+0.012better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Bev Warner / Jacqueline Czeiska
2026-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hedy Kurland
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Janet Jensen / Justine Miller
2026-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Sackheim
+0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jeani Voss / Jacqueline Czeiska
2026-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candi Baranski
0.042below expectation — took 32% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Karen MacPhail / Anne LaFever
2026-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Jane Bartley
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.