Teams

GTC-Souza-The Howdy Doodie Gang

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.89 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-06-12vs BETC-HughesWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Cotton / Denise Dubuque vs Barbara Selemon / Jill Wakefield2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-05vs SWW-JTC-RonningSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarsha White / Casey Hunter vs Liz VanDerschelden / Lauri Iwasaki2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Conover / Barbara van Sickle vs Jacqueline DeLeon / Leslie Engelhard6-4, 6-4
2026-06-04vs SWW-VAC-RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Souza / Teresa Conover vs Cindy Stoneback / Rochelle Fransen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Shouse / Marsha White vs Connie Ray / Jill Tokarczyk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeanne Hill / Barbara Johnson vs Abby Grant / Sarah Ryan1-6, 4-6
2026-05-28vs SWW-VAC-RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara van Sickle / Marsha White vs Mona Forster / Deborah Sargeant5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Cotton / Casey Hunter vs Cindy Stoneback / Martha Brenna4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeanne Hill / Barbara Johnson vs Sarah Ryan / Jill Waters6-2, 6-4
2026-05-22vs SWW-JTC-RonningLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara van Sickle / Marsha White vs Loreal ARGYLE / Shelly Hebert1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Souza / Casey Hunter vs Jacqueline DeLeon / Barbara Turner6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Conover / Barbara Johnson vs Leslie Engelhard / Chris Stewart1-6, 3-6
2026-05-21vs CP-ShotSisters-EssingerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Blegen / Barbara Cotton vs Linda Greenlaw / Nancy Goldberg7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs SWW-VAC-RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Conover / Mary Souza vs Mona Forster / Connie Ray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCasey Hunter / Marsha White vs Sarah Ryan / Martha Brenna6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Kathy Shouse vs Nachiko Yamamoto / Kristine Cramer1-6, 7-6
2026-05-07vs SWW-JTC-RonningLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Conover / Mary Souza vs Karen Little / Pam Rasanen4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Hunter / Marsha White vs Leslie Engelhard / Chris Stewart6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarbara van Sickle / Kathy Shouse vs Liz VanDerschelden / Debbie Donovan4-6, 3-6
2026-04-30vs VAC-FinnLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Souza / Teresa Conover vs Karen Tracy / Sandy Howard6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLeanne Hill / Barbara Johnson vs Shelley Stern / Kristen Case6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Shouse / Barbara van Sickle vs Marybeth Matlock / Violet Clerget2-6, 2-6
2026-04-24vs NWW-NTC-TuckerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Blegen / Barbara Cotton vs Susan Cross / Alison Aleinikoff6-3, 6-3
2026-04-16vs VAC-FinnLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Conover / Marsha White vs Marybeth Matlock / Martha Maggi4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Shouse / Barbara Johnson vs Pamela Finn / Sandy Howard1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-10vs VAC-FinnLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Conover / Casey Hunter vs Martha Maggi / Karen Tracy3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Shouse / Barbara van Sickle vs Pamela Finn / Sandy Howard4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeanne Hill / Barbara Johnson vs Marybeth Matlock / Janie Daray7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Mary Souza
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Barbara Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Casey Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Marsha White
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.69
Barbara Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.67
Kathy Shouse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Teresa Conover
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Barbara van Sickle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Leanne Hill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Conover + Mary Souza3746% games+2.6% vs expected
Kathy Shouse + Marsha White392155% games+2.0% vs expected
Leanne Hill + Barbara Johnson3351% games+1.3% vs expected
Barbara van Sickle + Marsha White1646% games−0.7% vs expected
Mary Souza + Casey Hunter15853% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Shouse + Barbara van Sickle11953% gamesnot enough data
Casey Hunter + Marsha White7256% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Conover + Casey Hunter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Souza
52W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Barbara Cotton
29W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Casey Hunter
51W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Marsha White
60W–45L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Barbara Johnson
8W–10L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Kathy Shouse
69W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Teresa Conover
12W–33L career · 12 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Barbara van Sickle
73W–72L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Leanne Hill
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.