Search

Mary Souza

Gig Harbor, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
112 matches · 52W–60L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.0
8 of 10
WA · 3.0
537 of 755

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Mary has gone from the 85th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.7% of games
6.0
54.1%
33W–28L · 53.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Casey Hunter
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Mona Forster / Connie Ray
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Karen Little / Pam Rasanen
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Conover
+0.038better than expected — took 38% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Cindy Hutchinson / Mary Ellen Jones
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Conover
0.003below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Sarah Ryan / Kristine Cramer
2025-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-4
W
Deana Brower / Stephanie Butlerchamps
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Casey Hunter
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
Molly Littlejohn / Denise Townsendchamps
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Casey Hunter
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Conover
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 7-6
W
Sandy Trudel / Marilynn Anderson
2025-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gigi Guneyli
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.