← Search

Deana Brower

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dover, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 20W–16L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-10-18 · PFC-Steiner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Lambert
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Lambert
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-16 · PFC-Steiner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Lambert
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-10-16 · PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-18 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Busch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-17 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Busch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-06-21 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Butler championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-20 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-10-27 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-27 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Voni Tombari
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-26 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Voni Tombari
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-10-25 · EW-PFC-Steiner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandee Andrews
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 57.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.4% of games
6.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer