Search

Shannon Lucas

VANCOUVER, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
30 matches · 18W–12L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
VANCOUVER · 3.0
6 of 8
WA · 3.0
550 of 755

Shannon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2014–2026
N OR-CGM-Venezia
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
CGM-Rakoz/Palena
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
CGM-Damiano/Rakoz
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
CGM-Heredia/Palena
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
CGM-Rakoz/Palena
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
CGM-Blunt
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shannon has gone from the 86th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
L
Bunny Rogan / Julie Dewittchamps
2026-06-28 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · with Delena Palena
0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Susan Busch / Marie Lambertchamps
2026-06-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · with Jaime Venezia
0.013below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · with Delena Palena
0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Kathy Cooke / Emma Chait
2026-06-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
0.003better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Kari Court / Jing Liu
2026-04-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Alyson Battistel / Carrie Jones
2026-03-01 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Larissa Kazantsev
0.046below expectation — took 56% of games against 71% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
0.012about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
0.014below expectation — took 55% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
0.025below expectation — took 59% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-12-07 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · with Cyndi Johnson
0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.