Search

Jennifer Kim

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
44 matches · 20W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
155 of 357
OR · 3.0
266 of 600

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jennifer has gone from the 36th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
W
Shari Matyas / Naomi Tsurumi
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Reyes Andreu
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Amanda Prifti / Katie Morrison
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aera Seo
+0.068better than expected — took 71% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Phyllis Shen
2026-02-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.045below expectation — took 32% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Blebea
+0.012about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Um
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sikhiu Huynh / Lisa Youngmixed
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Um
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Um
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Guinn
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nasser Khan
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Cormack
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Santiago Crespo
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
JEAN CHEN / Diana Crawford
2025-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Cariaga
+0.041better than expected — took 68% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.