← Search

Mubashir Cheema

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 71W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mubashir Cheema to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-07-10 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Gatzke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genyu Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Todd McConachie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-04 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-20 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd McConachie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd McConachie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruming Yin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-10 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lei Wan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-03 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lei Wan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.6%
34W–23L · 49.2% of games
4.0
5.3%
1W–18L · 31.3% of games
6.0mixed
53.1%
17W–15L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#1 Singles
19%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe