← Search

Ruming Yin

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 8W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ruming Yin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-06-05 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-10 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edgar Arruti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mubashir Cheema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-02-07 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramesh Reddy Nakkala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-30 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-25 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 47.9% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert