Search

Ruming Yin

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
28 matches · 8W–20L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
228 of 357
OR · 3.0
382 of 600

Ruming is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ruming has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 47.9% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-06-05 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
0.030below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Steve Honodel / Joseph Comer
2026-05-10 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · SAC-Henkhaus · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edgar Arruti
0.009about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Casey Graziano / Andrew McDonald
2026-03-28 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
+0.055better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Sheldon Katayama / Bert Stevens
2026-03-21 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
0.020below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
0.013about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mubashir Cheema
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
James North / Kerry Sweet
2026-02-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-02-07 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramesh Reddy Nakkala
+0.071better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-30 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-25 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.