SAC-Elmer/Harvey

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92

Todd McConachie

usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.92

Donny Cablao

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.92

Mohsen Soleimani

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.90

Nathan Watson

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3

2.87

Yogesh Patel

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3

2.87

Steve Elmer

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.78

Ruming Yin

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.76

Mauro Kobrinsky

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3

2.74

Brian Harvey

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.72

Craig Walker

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.52

Dave Sato

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Todd McConachie

51W–47L career

0%92%8%

2.92

Donny Cablao

42W–50L career

0%84%15%

2.92

Mohsen Soleimani

9W–20L career

0%90%10%

2.92

Nathan Watson

32W–41L career

0%95%5%

2.90

Yogesh Patel

46W–46L career

0%93%7%

2.87

Steve Elmer

61W–77L career

0%94%6%

2.87

Ruming Yin

8W–20L career

1%99%1%

2.78

Mauro Kobrinsky

14W–23L career

4%93%3%

2.76

Brian Harvey

15W–20L career

4%95%1%

2.74

Craig Walker

32W–39L career

10%86%4%

2.72

Dave Sato

40W–109L career

29%71%0%

2.52

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.