Search

John Bohls

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
56 matches · 30W–26L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
3%
stay 3.0
97%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 33% stay · 67% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
3 of 52
OR · 3.0
34 of 600

John is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

John has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, John has gone from the 57th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
3.0
56.4%
22W–17L · 55.6% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
W
Scott Fish / Hao Lee
2026-07-23 · The Unforced Errors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Satoshi Endo
+0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Shriram Shivaraman / Jacob Bobrowski
2026-06-12 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reno Brown
+0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Chris Burke
2026-06-10 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.017below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Andrew McDonald
2026-05-31 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.039below expectation — took 55% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Saul Hernandez Meza / Jason Feinberg
2026-05-30 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Davis
+0.012better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Matthew Lucas / Josh Berezin
2026-05-17 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Roth
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Gabe Miller / Joshua Lewis
2026-05-02 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Satoshi Endo
+0.053better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reno Brown
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Masataka Hayashi
+0.028better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Steve Honodel / Josh Berezin
2026-04-04 · MPRC-Alfonso/Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Douglas
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Agnihotri
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jake Janovetz / Dylan Martell
2026-02-28 · MPRC-Brown/Hayashi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reno Brown
+0.038better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.