Search

Joshua Kingsbury

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
40 matches · 16W–24L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
34%
stay 3.0
66%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 76% stay · 24% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
67 of 357
OR · 3.0
108 of 600

Joshua is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore
2026 Coed 18-39 · 6.0 Coed Combo
2026
SAC-Henkhaus
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2026
SAC-Ferschweiler
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
SAC-Ferschweiler
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore
2025 Coed 18-39 · 6.0 Coed Combo
2025
SAC-Bandi/Elmer
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joshua has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Joshua has gone from the 15th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
13W–13L · 51.1% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.9% of games
6.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-06-13 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
BHAVANI SHANKAR KRISHNA KUMAR
2026-05-10 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Andrew McDonald
2026-05-03 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.032below expectation — took 45% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myung-Gi Ji
0.013below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · SAC-Henkhaus · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.008better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myung-Gi Ji
+0.013about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1
L
Wei Li / Zhifeng Li
2026-02-21 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Bishnu Patra
+0.014about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4
W
Sagar Udyavara / Kshitij Akash Kadam
2026-01-23 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Chausmer
+0.068better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-2
L
Keaton Partch
2025-08-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-07-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.024below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.