SAC-Ferschweiler

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54

Matt Zhou

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

3.48

Vivek Mano

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.41

Srinivasa Kanamatha

usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5

3.35

Shawn Yu

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.34

Frank Ferschweiler

usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5

3.33

Jihoon Bang

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5

3.29

Hao Zhou

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5

3.22

Mubashir Cheema

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.03

Joshua Kingsbury

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.99

Myung-Gi Ji

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

2.87

Steve Elmer

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Matt Zhou

63W–65L career

0%71%29%

3.54

3.5

Vivek Mano

36W–21L career

0%84%16%

3.48

3.5

Srinivasa Kanamatha

73W–55L career

0%95%5%

3.41

3.5

Shawn Yu

27W–43L career

0%96%4%

3.35

3.5

Frank Ferschweiler

77W–41L career

0%98%2%

3.34

3.5

Jihoon Bang

57W–41L career

0%99%1%

3.33

3.5

Hao Zhou

8W–6L career

1%97%2%

3.29

3.5

Mubashir Cheema

71W–74L career

2%97%0%

3.22

Joshua Kingsbury

16W–24L career

0%69%31%

3.03

3.5

Myung-Gi Ji

9W–18L career

37%63%0%

2.99

Steve Elmer

61W–77L career

0%94%6%

2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.