Search

Pamela Hughes

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 22W–36L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
20%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
116 of 357
OR · 3.0
192 of 600

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams47 teams · 2007–2027
MPRC-Skoog/Nies
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2027
MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins 7.0
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2027
MPRC-Tompkins/Hazel
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2027
MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso
2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
N OR-WHRC-Nakatani
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
N OR-MPRC-Mitchell
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Pamela has gone from the 12th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
3.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 42.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-26 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Pettitt
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Douglas
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brett Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Pettitt
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Ramm
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-01 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Ramm
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · with Kimberly Thoren
0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Thoren
+0.005better than expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-20 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Thoren
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hoover
+0.003about as expected — took 42% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-02-14 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Thoren
0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-01-24 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Thoren
+0.014better than expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.