Search

Cyndi Johnson

Battle Ground, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 39W–22L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
53%
stay 3.0
47%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
260 of 755

Cyndi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cyndi has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Cyndi has gone from the 56th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
24W–16L · 54.3% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 67.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
W
Kathy Cooke / Emma Chait
2026-06-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Lucas
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Thao Nguyen / Stephanie Kelly
2026-04-19 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Rakoz
0.024below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Lucas
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Starkey
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-24 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Lucas
0.014below expectation — took 55% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Lucas
0.025below expectation — took 59% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-12-07 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Lucas
0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Starkey
+0.044better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-23 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Lucas
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-11-09 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tiffany Starkey
0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-18 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tiffany Starkey
0.019about as expected — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.