← Search

Alisa Rakoz

Battle Ground, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 53W–73L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Alisa Rakoz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-09-12 · CGM-Locke/Venezia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Horenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Cantillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amarjeet Dadiala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Cantillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5
L
2026-07-24 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Cantillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-04 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
43.8%
28W–36L · 47.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
10W–20L · 43.1% of games
6.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#1 Singles
23%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe