Search

Margaret Convery

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
82 matches · 41W–41L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
161 of 357
OR · 3.0
272 of 600

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams27 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Margaret has gone from the 44th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
12W–12L · 54.1% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.6% of games
6.0
75%
9W–3L · 65.5% of games
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-06-14 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JaReda Webb
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Rachel Medrano / Alexandra MacDonald
2026-06-12 · Ladies Who Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cierra Speck
0.023below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Larson / Janice Ackley
2026-05-17 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mihee Park
+0.014better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Staci Kristin / Carol Robertson
2026-05-09 · WHRC-Ha · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Woohyung Kim
0.019below expectation — took 59% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Chelsea Smith / Lindsey Yeung
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mihee Park
0.033below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Woohyung Kim
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Caryn Cohen
0.061below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Caryn Cohen
0.025about as expected — took 67% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Teresa Zhao / Amy Pickens
2026-02-28 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Zagunis
0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · WHRC-Ha · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.