← Search

Margaret Convery

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 41W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Margaret Convery to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-06-14 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JaReda Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-12 · Ladies Who Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cierra Speck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mihee Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · WHRC-Ha · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Woohyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mihee Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Woohyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Caryn Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Caryn Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-02-28 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Zagunis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · WHRC-Ha · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
12W–12L · 54.1% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.6% of games
6.0
75%
9W–3L · 65.5% of games
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe