← Search

Jennifer Trank

LAKE OSWEGO, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 93W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Trank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Cricket Forsey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Stein-Gray championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Cricket Forsey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Sumner Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Bunch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Berner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Berner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cricket Forsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
46.8%
29W–33L · 51.3% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 41.4% of games
6.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 53.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
55 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova