Search

Jennifer Trank

LAKE OSWEGO, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
197 matches · 93W–104L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
68%
stay 3.0
32%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
LAKE OSWEGO · 3.0
2 of 7
OR · 3.0
165 of 600

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams51 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jennifer has gone from the 23rd to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
46.8%
29W–33L · 51.3% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 41.4% of games
6.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 53.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history197 matches
L
Julie Dewitt / Bunny Roganchamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Cricket Forsey
0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Stein-Gray
+0.034better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Annette Hatley / Susan Humphreychamps
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Cricket Forsey
+0.084better than expected — took 68% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Sumner Brooks
0.012below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bell
0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Bunch
0.026below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Trank
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Henry
0.017below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Fox / Jean Kastner
2026-05-16 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Berner
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Loida Erhard / Kheoshi Owens
2026-04-25 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Berner
0.042below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cricket Forsey
+0.022about as expected — took 38% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Ali Waterman / Layla Gonzalez
2026-04-12 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bell
0.001about as expected — took 58% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.