← Search

Laura Laney

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 59W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Laney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-07-17 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cullen Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Fernando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Peg McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-22 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-02 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Bachhuber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-19 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Jaques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.4% of games
3.5
48.1%
26W–28L · 49.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King