← Search

Peggy Jaques

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-10-31 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-10 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-4
L
2026-03-19 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-21 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-13 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Grewe
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-02-15 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-21 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-10-15 · MAC-Leedy/Jones · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Leedy
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-09-24 · MAC-Leedy/Jones · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 38.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King