← Search

Chris van Leeuwen

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 90W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Chris van Leeuwen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-13 · SHC-Lake/Welter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Korenek-Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Eargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-02-28 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-01-10 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-09 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-03 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-13 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Welter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-08-22 · #3 Doubles · with Kiersten Lake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2015–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.7% of games
3.5
70.7%
29W–12L · 55.3% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 67.2% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal