Search

Chris van Leeuwen

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
128 matches · 90W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
11%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.34. Lower than today’s 3.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
12 of 60
OR · 3.5
163 of 735

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams37 teams · 2015–2027
SHC-Lake/Welter
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2027
N OR-SHC-Zielinski
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
SHC-Hobi
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
SHC-Welter/Eargle
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
SHC-Trank
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
SHC-Christensen/Vedder
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Chris has gone from the 55th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.7% of games
3.5
70.7%
29W–12L · 55.3% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 67.2% of games
7.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-06-14 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
0.027below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Eargle
0.017below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-28 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-01-10 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-09 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
0.027below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-03 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hobi
+0.030better than expected — took 92% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake
0.023below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
+0.011better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake
0.003about as expected — took 46% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Welter
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Juli Parlan / Ann Lewischamps
2025-08-22 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · with Kiersten Lake
+0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-08 · SHC-Hobi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerri Patrick
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.