← Search

Julie Hanson

Beaverton, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 47W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Norby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Yu Zhang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Norby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sellke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerome Deluz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Sivertsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Fenner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Sivertsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · THPRD-Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerome Deluz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danny Denning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-19 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sellke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edmund Yuan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 42.6% of games
4.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 41.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.7% of games
8.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 44.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 17.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
8.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert