Search

Shannon Chen

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
99 matches · 67W–32L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
2%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
44 of 266
OR · 4.0
84 of 498

Shannon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Shannon has gone from the 69th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
72.2%
26W–10L · 57.7% of games
4.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 53% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
14W–0L · 61.2% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-06-07 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie OBrien
+0.030better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · SAC-O'Donnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · SAC-O'Donnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
0.021below expectation — took 56% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-23 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helen Chen
+0.014about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Nikki Metcalf / Elizabeth Lahti
2026-05-16 · SAC-O'Donnell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
+0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-10 · SAC-O'Donnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
+0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helen Chen
+0.030better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helen Chen
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Deanna Lautenbach / Emily Hagelgans
2026-04-24 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Benedict
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · SAC-O'Donnell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
0.043below expectation — took 44% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helen Chen
+0.075better than expected — took 75% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · SAC-O'Donnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chen
0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.