Teams

SAC-Yu

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Michael Furuya
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.03
Sydney Taggart
published 4.5
4.00
Tamara Justus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Saurabh Chauhan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.84
Shannon Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Martin von Haartman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Bo Yu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Jian Xu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Kim Tellin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Shawn Yu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Constance Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Michael Furuya
26W–26L career
0%96%3%
4.27
4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
22%77%1%
4.03
4.5
Tamara Justus
98W–68L career
16%84%0%
4.00
4.5
Saurabh Chauhan
55W–32L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4
Shannon Chen
67W–32L career
0%98%1%
3.84
4
Martin von Haartman
140W–50L career
5%95%0%
3.66
4
Bo Yu
105W–180L career
4%96%0%
3.65
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Jian Xu
138W–56L career
0%86%14%
3.48
3.5
Kim Tellin
110W–71L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Shawn Yu
27W–43L career
0%96%4%
3.35
3.5
Constance Erickson
34W–7L career
1%98%2%
3.31

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.