SAC-Boyce

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84

Shannon Chen

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.66

Martin von Haartman

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.48

Jian Xu

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.48

Vivek Mano

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.38

Kim Tellin

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.37

Timothea Barnatan

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.34

Frank Ferschweiler

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.28

Shawn Boyce

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.22

Jill Boyce

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.10

Rajan Madhusudan

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

2.87

Steve Elmer

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Shannon Chen

67W–32L career

0%98%1%

3.84

Martin von Haartman

140W–50L career

5%95%0%

3.66

3.5

Jian Xu

138W–56L career

0%86%14%

3.48

3.5

Vivek Mano

36W–21L career

0%84%16%

3.48

3.5

Kim Tellin

110W–71L career

0%97%3%

3.38

3.5

Timothea Barnatan

95W–117L career

0%98%2%

3.37

3.5

Frank Ferschweiler

77W–41L career

0%98%2%

3.34

3.5

Shawn Boyce

170W–125L career

0%99%0%

3.28

3.5

Jill Boyce

148W–90L career

2%98%0%

3.22

3.5

Rajan Madhusudan

94W–79L career

13%87%0%

3.10

Steve Elmer

61W–77L career

0%94%6%

2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.