Teams

N OR-SHC-Zielinski

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Amy Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Andrea Hobi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Katie Terrill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Ruth Semon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Babette Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Maggie Creps Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Patricia Eargle
published 3.5
3.27
Joy Lin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kiersten Lake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Maguire
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Amy Murphy
48W–30L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
76W–80L career · type A
0%87%13%
3.47
3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%91%9%
3.44
3.5
Katie Terrill
28W–27L career
0%93%7%
3.42
3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%92%8%
3.40
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–31L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%96%4%
3.35
3.5
Maggie Creps Weaver
16W–12L career
0%97%3%
3.33
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%2%
3.30
3.5
Joy Lin
11W–26L career
3%95%2%
3.27
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth Maguire
78W–42L career
5%95%0%
3.19

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.